While I am sure this is profoundly unnecessary since I’ve covered this in multiple elsewhere, even so, I’m doing this under the principle of “If for any reason there is misinformation on your front page, you clarify/correct/retract on the front page, not hidden in the back” . . . or the comments, in this case.
On Friday I said that Rod Serling died because he was mowing his lawn. I had a source for this, but I didn’t link to it because I could only link to the page, and couldn’t give a specific pointer to the location on the page of the information, so I just encouraged people to “look it up.” In the process, I inadvertently proved a truism of the Internet Universe:
Posting something incorrect generates more responses than all the postings of correct information and the postings of a request for correct information combined.
From here, I’ll copy and paste my response from the comments:
“Since the reference turned out to be more obscure than I anticipated (you’re not the only person that mentioned this to me), I did a little more digging beyond my original source (IMDB: “On June 28, 1975, he was mowing his lawn, when all of a sudden, he began to experience some chest pains, and collapsed. His neighbor found him and called the ambulance. When he arrived in the operating room, the doctors saw that the artery leading to his heart was disintegrating and there was no hope for him. He died later that day in the hospital.”)
There seems to be some confusion on the point of which heart attack went with the mowing instance, but most sources I found said he was mowing the lawn during his first heart attack, and had a quick downward spiral from there, so I’ll go with that version then.
Even so . . . it was still the mowing the lawn that triggered that downward spiral. You’ve been warned.”
Two thoughts come to my mind from all this:
#1. I’m happy beyond words that when I said “Look it up,” somebody (actually several somebodies) took my words to heart and did just that.
#2. I wonder what would have happened if I said “Make me some nachos” instead.
It’s worth thinking about . . . food for thought, one might say.